Battle Report Evolve Big Alpha on the Xbox One

first_imgIt seems like many of the major game studios are currently trying their hand at some form of mostly online first person shooter, placing greater focus on the online gameplay than anything else. Unlike Titanfall and Destiny, however, the folks at Turtle Rock Studios and 2K Games have decided to focus on a game that is deliberately unbalanced, and is creating an experience where both careful strategy and split second twitch-shooter skills come together to create a monster hunt.This weekend many users are logging on to check out Evolve in its Alpha state for the first time, and after a few hours playing it’s clear this is going to be a great online-only game.Where most online shooters work hard to create a balance between the two sides that are fighting, usually over multi-colored flags or curiously lit patches of dirt, Evolve is intentionally unbalanced. Every fight is four on one, and that’s because the one on the other side is a giant beast. If you’re playing as one of the four hunters, your job is to work together with your squad to hunt down and eliminate this beast before it gets powerful enough to either eliminate you or eliminate the power station for the base in the area.Where things get particularly sticky for the squad of four is the forced character assignment. Everyone in the squad can only be one character type. While the game could certainly be easier if your team was comprised of four big bruisers with lightning guns, the forced placement makes it so everyone in the squad has a job and must work together in order to take the monster down.You’ve got your tracker, your medic, your support character, and your tank. Each character is absolutely vital, and when everyone on the squad does their job it’s not that hard to take down a monster. Since that level of cooperation isn’t always easy when playing online with total strangers, your best chance for victory is to be playing with friends.Playing as the monster represents a very interesting set of challenges. When you first start the round, monsters are very easy to kill. As the monster, you need to avoid detection and eat the other beasts in the area in order to build up armor and speed up your evolution. As you evolve you get stronger and more difficult to kill, but if you are trapped before you hit that first evolution there’s a good chance you won’t survive.Since the tracker in the squad of four is very good at locating you, the first few minutes of the fight is all about continuous movement and careful kills to avoid detection. After the first evolution the fight is a lot more balanced, and after the second evolution the monster has the upper hand. Its not impossible to kill a fully evolved monster, but it requires a lot of teamwork to pull off.While each of the four character in the assault squad are interesting in their own right, the most interesting is perhaps the medic. Like most healer characters, your job is to sit back and do whatever you can to keep your team alive. Unlike most healer characters, you have absolutely no way to deal direct damage to the monster you are fighting. Healers have a special gun that can heal from a distance, as well as a sniper rifle that decreases the armor on the monster in a specific area of the body and a tranquilizer gun that can slow the monster down, but none of these weapons are capable of actually dealing damage.The ability to bypass the armor makes fights with evolved monsters a little easier, and a tranquilizer shot or three in the early stages can quickly end a match. It’s also nice to know that the healing gun can resurrect fallen enemies from a distance, just in case the monster decides to thrash on top of your tank character for a while.You can still get in on the Evolve Alpha if you haven’t gotten a code yet, just by heading over to the Evolve website and requesting one. So far there’s a lot to like about Evolve, but there are still plenty of questions to be answered about repetitive online gameplay and whether or not there’s going to be a decent story mode. Evolve in its current form runs the risk of getting old quickly like Titanfall, but there’s still plenty we don’t know about this game yet. It’s probably best to just enjoy the Alpha for now and wait for the folks at Turtle Rock Studios to explain everything in due course. Happy hunting!last_img read more

East Antarcticas ice is melting at an unexpectedly rapid clip new study

first_imgA new study shows the East Antarctic Ice Sheet, once thought to be stable, may be melting faster than expected. East Antarctica’s ice is melting at an unexpectedly rapid clip, new study suggests Click to view the privacy policy. Required fields are indicated by an asterisk (*) Email Antarctica’s melting ice, which has caused global sea levels to rise by at least 13.8 millimeters over the past 40 years, was long thought to come from primarily one place: the unstable West Antarctic Ice Sheet. Now, scientists studying 40 years of satellite images have found that the East Antarctic Ice Sheet—considered largely insulated from the ravages of climate change—may also be melting at an accelerating rate. Those results, at odds with a large 2018 study, could dramatically reshape projections of sea level rise if confirmed.“If this paper is right, it changes the ball game for sea level rise in this century,” says Princeton University climate scientist Michael Oppenheimer, who was not involved in the new work. East Antarctica’s ice sheet holds 10 times the ice of its rapidly melting neighbor to the west.The West Antarctic Ice Sheet, whose base is below sea level, has long been considered the most vulnerable to collapse. With an assist from gravity, a deep current of warm water slips beneath the sheet, melting it from below until it becomes a floating shelf at risk of breaking away. In contrast, frigid temperatures and a base mostly above sea level are thought to keep the East Antarctic Ice Sheet relatively safe from warm water intrusion. A collaboration of more than 60 scientists last year, published in Nature, estimated that the East Antarctic Ice Sheet actually added about 5 billion tons of ice each year from 1992 to 2017. Sign up for our daily newsletter Get more great content like this delivered right to you! Countrycenter_img Torsten Blackwood/Pool/Getty Images Country * Afghanistan Aland Islands Albania Algeria Andorra Angola Anguilla Antarctica Antigua and Barbuda Argentina Armenia Aruba Australia Austria Azerbaijan Bahamas Bahrain Bangladesh Barbados Belarus Belgium Belize Benin Bermuda Bhutan Bolivia, Plurinational State of Bonaire, Sint Eustatius and Saba Bosnia and Herzegovina Botswana Bouvet Island Brazil British Indian Ocean Territory Brunei Darussalam Bulgaria Burkina Faso Burundi Cambodia Cameroon Canada Cape Verde Cayman Islands Central African Republic Chad Chile China Christmas Island Cocos (Keeling) Islands Colombia Comoros Congo Congo, the Democratic Republic of the Cook Islands Costa Rica Cote d’Ivoire Croatia Cuba Curaçao Cyprus Czech Republic Denmark Djibouti Dominica Dominican Republic Ecuador Egypt El Salvador Equatorial Guinea Eritrea Estonia Ethiopia Falkland Islands (Malvinas) Faroe Islands Fiji Finland France French Guiana French Polynesia French Southern Territories Gabon Gambia Georgia Germany Ghana Gibraltar Greece Greenland Grenada Guadeloupe Guatemala Guernsey Guinea Guinea-Bissau Guyana Haiti Heard Island and McDonald Islands Holy See (Vatican City State) Honduras Hungary Iceland India Indonesia Iran, Islamic Republic of Iraq Ireland Isle of Man Israel Italy Jamaica Japan Jersey Jordan Kazakhstan Kenya Kiribati Korea, Democratic People’s Republic of Korea, Republic of Kuwait Kyrgyzstan Lao People’s Democratic Republic Latvia Lebanon Lesotho Liberia Libyan Arab Jamahiriya Liechtenstein Lithuania Luxembourg Macao Macedonia, the former Yugoslav Republic of Madagascar Malawi Malaysia Maldives Mali Malta Martinique Mauritania Mauritius Mayotte Mexico Moldova, Republic of Monaco Mongolia Montenegro Montserrat Morocco Mozambique Myanmar Namibia Nauru Nepal Netherlands New Caledonia New Zealand Nicaragua Niger Nigeria Niue Norfolk Island Norway Oman Pakistan Palestine Panama Papua New Guinea Paraguay Peru Philippines Pitcairn Poland Portugal Qatar Reunion Romania Russian Federation Rwanda Saint Barthélemy Saint Helena, Ascension and Tristan da Cunha Saint Kitts and Nevis Saint Lucia Saint Martin (French part) Saint Pierre and Miquelon Saint Vincent and the Grenadines Samoa San Marino Sao Tome and Principe Saudi Arabia Senegal Serbia Seychelles Sierra Leone Singapore Sint Maarten (Dutch part) Slovakia Slovenia Solomon Islands Somalia South Africa South Georgia and the South Sandwich Islands South Sudan Spain Sri Lanka Sudan Suriname Svalbard and Jan Mayen Swaziland Sweden Switzerland Syrian Arab Republic Taiwan Tajikistan Tanzania, United Republic of Thailand Timor-Leste Togo Tokelau Tonga Trinidad and Tobago Tunisia Turkey Turkmenistan Turks and Caicos Islands Tuvalu Uganda Ukraine United Arab Emirates United Kingdom United States Uruguay Uzbekistan Vanuatu Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of Vietnam Virgin Islands, British Wallis and Futuna Western Sahara Yemen Zambia Zimbabwe By Alex FoxJan. 14, 2019 , 3:30 PM But as climate change shifts wind patterns around Antarctica, some scientists think warm water carried by a circular current off the continental shelf will start to invade East Antarctica’s once unassailable ice. “People who study Antarctic ice know that East Antarctica has the potential to start losing significant amounts of ice, but it’s never been clear how fast that would [happen],” Oppenheimer says.To find out how fast that ice loss is happening, glaciologist Eric Rignot of the University of California, Irvine, and colleagues combined 40 years of satellite imagery and climate modeling. The models were used to estimate annual snowfall, which over time adds ice to the region’s glaciers. Then, the team measured the speed of ice flowing out to sea by tracking visual landmarks on the glaciers through time. This allowed them to estimate how much ice each of the continent’s many glaciers sent out to sea each year from 1979 to 2017. By subtracting the amount of ice added annually by snow from the amount of ice lost to sea, the researchers determined how much ice was gained or lost.“After staring at satellite photos for hours you go a little cross-eyed, but it’s basic statistics—you beat down the noise by adding more data points,” Rignot says. “Tracking down these old satellite photos and spending months analyzing by hand was worth it to create this long-term record.”Overall, the study found that Antarctica now sends six times more ice plunging into the sea each year than it did in 1979. During the 40-year period of the study, Antarctica added 13.8 millimeters to sea level, with the majority coming from West Antarctica. But East Antarctica, particularly the area known as Wilkes Land, was responsible for more than 30% of Antarctica’s contribution to sea level rise, the researchers report today in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. “The more we look at this system the more we realize this is a fragile system,” Rignot says. “Once these glaciers are destabilized there is no red button to press to stop it.”If intensifying polar winds are responsible for the intrusion of warm waters beneath East Antarctica, the situation is likely to get worse, Rignot says. The increasing strength of those winds is owed in part to the contrast in temperature between Antarctica and the rest of the world. As greenhouse gases warm much of the planet, this temperature differential is likely to intensify, driving even stronger westerlies, he adds.But the bold new results won’t be accepted without a fight, says glaciologist Richard Alley of Pennsylvania State University in University Park, who was not involved in either study. “There will be a lot of comparisons between the methods used to create these estimates and those in the [previous study],” he says. In addition to the ice-tracking method used in the current paper, the previous one also gathered two other measurements: one that estimated ice loss by repeatedly “weighing” the ice sheet via satellite, and one that estimated changes in elevation on the glacier’s surface from planes and satellites.No matter the outcome, Rignot hopes the study brings greater attention to a part of Antarctica that has traditionally been understudied. Helen Fricker, a glaciologist at the Scripps Institution of Oceanography in San Diego, California, agrees. “We need to monitor the entirety of Antarctica and we just can’t do that without international cooperation,” Fricker says. “We can’t take our eyes off this ice.”last_img read more